Projects.chat
Contact Join the waitlist
Features AI Pricing Security Contact
For your team
Agencies Startups Remote teams Freelancers Product teams Marketing teams Join the waitlist

For product teams

Specs, decisions and follow-through in one place.

The document, the discussion about the document, and the work that came out of it — all in the same project, all searchable, none of it copy-pasted between three tools.

  • Specs with paragraph-level comments and full history
  • Discussion attached to the thing it's about
  • Turn a settled thread straight into to-dos

Sound familiar?

The bits that make this job harder than it should be

The spec and the conversation live apart

Doc in one tool, the debate in another, the tickets in a third. By sprint two the doc is a lie and nobody has told it.

Decisions evaporate

Six weeks later: "why is it built this way?" The answer was in a thread that got archived, in a tool you've since migrated off.

Copy-paste is the integration

Someone's whole job is turning agreed things into tickets, by hand, badly, on a Monday.

What Projects.chat does about it

Built around how product teams actually work

Specs that stay honest

Rich documents with inline comments and complete version history. You can see what the spec said the day it was approved, and what changed after.

More on Documents

The debate next to the artefact

Threaded discussion in the same project as the doc it's about. The reasoning stays attached to the decision.

More on Message board

Thread to backlog in one prompt

"Turn the decisions in this thread into a to-do list, assigned to the right people, with the dates we agreed." It proposes; you approve it or edit it.

More on AI chat & agents

Answer 'why' in one search

Semantic search across specs, threads and comments, so "why did we drop offline mode" returns the actual conversation rather than nothing.

More on Search

The AI part

An assistant that has read the whole project.

Product teams point it at the messy parts:

How the AI works Data & privacy
Turn the agreed items in this thread into a to-do list with owners.
What changed in this spec since the version we approved on the 3rd?
Summarise the open objections to the new onboarding flow.
Draft release notes from the to-dos we completed this sprint.

Pricing

Guests are free. Always.

You pay for your team, never for the clients and collaborators you work with. Waitlist members keep founding prices for twelve months.

Free

For solo work and small side projects.

$0 forever

Start free
  • Up to 3 projects
  • Up to 10 people
  • 1 GB of file storage
  • 100 AI credits a month
  • Docs, messages, to-dos, calendar
  • Community support
Most teams pick this
Team

For teams who want everything in one place.

$12 per person / month

Billed monthly, or $10 per person when billed yearly.

Join the waitlist
  • Unlimited projects
  • 100 GB of file storage
  • 2,000 AI credits per person, per month
  • Free guest seats for clients
  • Semantic search across everything
  • AI agents that can create to-dos and docs
  • Priority email support
Unlimited

One flat price. Invite the whole company.

$299 per month, flat

Unlimited people. $249/month when billed yearly.

Join the waitlist
  • Everything in Team
  • Unlimited people — no per-seat pricing
  • 1 TB of file storage
  • 25,000 pooled AI credits a month
  • Bring your own OpenAI or Anthropic key
  • SSO / SAML and audit log
  • Onboarding session with a founder

Full comparison and what an AI credit means

Product teams usually ask

Is this a Jira replacement?
Not for a fifty-person engineering org running sprints on story points. For teams who want a spec, a discussion and a clear list of what's next, it removes two tools and a lot of ceremony.
Can engineers stay in their own tools?
There's an API and webhooks, so project activity can flow to wherever your engineers actually live rather than forcing them into another tab.
When can I actually use it?
We're building in the open and opening access in batches. Everyone on the waitlist gets an invite in the order they joined, and founding members get in before the public launch. Join the list and we'll email you the moment your batch opens — no other emails, ever.
Is this meant to replace Slack?
No. Chat is great for right now; it's terrible for anything that needs to outlive the afternoon. Projects.chat is where the decisions, documents and commitments live, and most teams keep both — with project activity posted into the channels that want it.

Something we haven't answered? Ask us directly — a person replies.

Work somewhere else?

Agencies Startups Remote teams Freelancers Marketing teams

Keep the reasoning with the work.

Join the waitlist and help shape how documents, discussion and to-dos fit together.

Free to join. One email when your invite is ready — nothing else, ever.